The Panopticon/Characters named only in novelisations

From Tardis Wiki, the free Doctor Who reference
< User:SOTO‎ | Forum Archive
Revision as of 23:29, 27 April 2023 by SV7 (talk | contribs) (Bot: Automated text replacement (-'''User:(SOTO/Forum Archive)/(.*?)/\@comment-([\d\.]+)-(\d+)'''\n([\s\S]*)\[\[Category:SOTO archive posts\]\] +\5\2/\4-\3, -'''User:(SOTO/Forum Archive)/(.*?)/\@comment-(.*?)'''([\s\S]*) ?\{\{retitle\|///(.*?)\}\} +{{retitle|\2/\5}}\n'''User:\1/\2/@comment-\3'''\4))
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)

I noticed in a couple of places that unnamed characters who are named in novelisations have their novelisation names mentioned as a side-note (as with Pilot and Co-pilot (The Horns of Nimon)).

Tardis:Valid sources/Detailed list mentions that television info supercedes novelisation info when in conflict. Is an unnamed character having a name actually a conflict or contradiction with what's in the story?