User talk:The Thirteenth Doctor
Is it OK if I-
Is it OK if I delete most of the stuff on my talk page? Maybe I should star afresh and clear away all the rubbish written on there.
?
Thank You
~ ThePandoricaOpens666 20:29 (UST)
Articles that need updating - main page
Done, I was just waiting on some final feedback on the forum page. --Tangerineduel 11:35, September 16, 2010 (UTC)
Rollback rights
Hey, I was wondering if you'd like rollback rights (see Tardis:User rights#Users with Rollback rights for more info). You're good at identifying vandalism and other elements like that and I think it'd be of benefit to you and the wiki. --Tangerineduel 16:19, September 18, 2010 (UTC)
- Done. Good luck, feel free to ask me anything or whatever. --Tangerineduel 13:35, September 19, 2010 (UTC)
Contents Box
Hi again. Can you tell me how to do a contents info box as it is not working when I try to make one. Thanks. Ghastly9090 15:27, September 23, 2010 (UTC)
Sorry
Sorry about making the Series 6 episode page. But thanks for warning me.
Rhain1999
Doctor Who spoofs
There is some difference between Curse of Fatal Death and other sketches.
The Curse of Fatal Death article is an exception to these spoofs for plenty of reasons, key amongst these is that it's a fully formed adventure and was given a stand-alone video release, the others haven't they've always formed parts of other shows, often as skits that are part of those shows. The other sketches were released 'bonus features' of the Curse of the Fatal Death video, rather than 'along with it'.
I think that the Doctor Who parodies page covers the sketches fine enough. It covers sketches from the 70s to 2000s. There isn't anything really significant about the Lenny Henry sketch, nothing that holds it above most of the other sketches on that article.
I seem to recall the Extras sketch having an article before it was prop deleted, all the other sketches are roughly the same length and in a similar genre of shows.
I think there would likely be a case for such an article's deletion if created, however, a case could be made for its inclusion, though it'd need to have an overwhelming amount of information, more info than could be included on the Doctor Who parodies page. More information than the Extras info that's already on there. Also while you could create an article based on the TV story article layout you'd really need to fill it with a lot of information and especially sourced information, given the sketch's limited availability.
Create the article on your user page as you suggest, I'll take a look at it if you wish before you either move it to an article page or put it to the forums. Thanks. --Tangerineduel 15:22, September 25, 2010 (UTC)
Unsourced Edit
Why did you revert 60.241.108.140's edit on Cyber-Lord (Blood of the Cybermen)? There is nothing in the game that suggests they come from 21st Century. Can you please provide your source? --203.168.176.42 09:05, September 26, 2010 (UTC)
Please Do Not Revert Others' Legitimate Edits
Please stop reverting legitimate edits. You have reverted quite a few legitimate edits by different IP addresses. For example, in Blood of the Cybermen, it is clearly stated that the Cyber-Lord and the Cybermen were caught in a timestorm and they are not from present day, 60.241.108.140's edit was perfectly legitimate, yet you reverted his/her edit without providing any rationale. --203.168.176.42 03:05, September 27, 2010 (UTC)
- Aside: since the rollback feature doesn't allow for an edit reason, I've found it best to use that for spam and vandalism (or edit wars) only. When a reason is obviously needed, the "undo" is a much better option, since it allows for a reason to be entered, which often aids understanding over a simple revert. -- sulfur 10:40, September 27, 2010 (UTC)
The Pandorica is Taken to Rome?
Where in The Big Bang has it been stated that the Pandorica was taken to Rome? The only thing mentioned that's remotely related was that the myth of the Pandorica was implied to be very old. --203.168.176.42 03:20, September 27, 2010 (UTC)
Please Do Not Abuse the Rollback Feature
Jack's home era is listed as 51st Century. It is completely unreasonable for you to revert 60.241.108.140's edit, which provided more accurate information than the article's previous edit. --203.168.176.42 15:59, September 27, 2010 (UTC)
IP edits/talk comments
I've looked over the user in question edit's/talk comments.
They can be perceived as somewhat antagonistic, but they don't breach out policies such as our Tardis:Discussion policy or Tardis:No personal attacks policy, yet.
I've left a comment on their talk page commenting on their recent edits.
If it escalates please contact me. Thanks. --Tangerineduel 16:36, September 27, 2010 (UTC)
