User:SOTO/Forum Archive/The Panopticon/@comment-88790-20121208143712/@comment-1272640-20170810012918

From Tardis Wiki, the free Doctor Who reference
< User:SOTO‎ | Forum Archive‎ | The Panopticon/@comment-88790-20121208143712
Revision as of 20:56, 27 April 2023 by SV7 (talk | contribs) (Bot: Automated import of articles)
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)

User:SOTO/Forum Archive/The Panopticon/@comment-88790-20121208143712/@comment-1272640-20170810012918

NateBumber wrote: So, to recap:

  • This isn't intended by the series' authors to be some kind of one-way connection: in a Faction Paradox novel by the author of a Señor 105 novella, a character has a vision of a scene with Rodrigo from a Señor 105 short story by another author. Even more directly, Señor 105 has appeared alongside the Fourth and Sixth Doctors in charity stories written by Señor 105 authors; obviously these stories aren't valid, but they clearly indicate that said authors see the Señor as existing in the same universe as the Doctor.
  • Yes, the creator said on Facebook that the series probably isn't relevant to a Doctor Who Wiki, but he's also personally written (since-deleted) articles about it here; besides, there's no reason to think that he knows anything about the four little rules, so an opinion about whether it belongs on the wiki isn't an opinion about whether it's set in the universe. (See all of the above evidence.)

Am I missing anything? This debate has been open for literally five years; I think it's about time for us to wind it down and give Señor 105 the coverage it deserves.

Earlier, people were suggesting that we couldn't take the creator at his word, to which I say:

If the author says he has permission to use Venus, and Obverse is trusting him, what reason for doubt do we have that he's lying? Seems a bit unfair to me.