Toggle menu
Toggle preferences menu
Toggle personal menu
Not logged in
Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits.

User:SOTO/Forum Archive/The Panopticon/@comment-4139960-20130129190934/@comment-26975268-20130722061235

From Tardis Wiki, the free Doctor Who reference
< User:SOTO‎ | Forum Archive‎ | The Panopticon/@comment-4139960-20130129190934
Revision as of 19:32, 27 April 2023 by SV7 (talk | contribs) (Bot: Automated import of articles)
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)

User:SOTO/Forum Archive/The Panopticon/@comment-4139960-20130129190934/@comment-26975268-20130722061235 Bump. Allow me to give some input to feed the discussion.

I recently revisited the series 2 Torchwood website, which is no longer under the original URL but can still be found here. I would definitely argue that the "jobs" section of the site is perfectly narrative, telling multiple stories from different people's perspectives and overall supplanting information from other media. In fact, notice how you can't even get to the real-world sections of the website from there!

But I suppose some would disagree. Because of the ambiguity of this case, I will (grudgingly — I could fill up half a calendar with that site!) stand by my previous opinion and say that we should not consider websites as a valid source for DWU info. Period.

After all, we need to create a simple, solid rule. It can't be "sometimes websites can be considered valid, but not always". We can't start forum threads for every single website and every single page on them to determine if they're valid. So, even though I still do feel like we're missing out on a lot with sections like Torchwood's "jobs", I will grudgingly go with "no websites at all" if that is what the rest feel.

Cookies help us deliver our services. By using our services, you agree to our use of cookies.