Talk:Jack Harkness
Jack's Timeline
Shouldn't the burial of Jack in 27 AD and reappearance in the early 20th century in Exit Wounds appear not at the end of the timeline but at the beginning? I realize this means Jack crosses his own timelines but it's odd to read of his activities in Torchwood in the 1900s without acknowledgment that his team unearthed a later version of him back then.69.125.134.86talk to me 16:29, December 17, 2012 (UTC)
Jack Harkness was . . . insert brief lead here and use past tense throughout article. See the Tardis:Tardis Manual and Layout guide if you have questions.
- N-no, no it shouldn't... OS25 (talk to me, baby.) 16:40, December 17, 2012 (UTC)
I have a question about policy regarding comments by actors. In explaining why Jack is immortal, John Barrowman stated:
""Now you're really getting me into the fan boy stuff here, it takes us all the way back to the first time Jack actually died and came back to life because we thought it was the time, uh.uh .the TARDIS that him brought him back to life. But it was..you know .because of the death you know from the Dalek, that all happened and it was Rose. It turns out that his blood is actually alien blood. So there's more to him than we ever thought. So it is his blood that keeps him alive, it was not time. You know there's all those questions now which NEED to be answered".
- JB, Dragon Con 2012, Starting at the 12 minute mark.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_detailpage&v=R8V9D_K0MA8#t=726s
Are insider comments by the actor considered noteworthy to add to the Skills and Abilities (Immortality) or Other Matters section of Jack's wiki? It appears to subvert canon and rewrite his known history.
Thanks. ~ ~ ~ ~ kpattersonraven
