Talk:Jenny (The Doctor's Daughter)
Time Lords a race?
Are the Time Lords a race, cause some sources e.g. REF: Doctor Who: The Encyclopedia says that they are but various sources mentioning before the Time War e.g. DW: The Invasion of Time seem to suggest that they are more of a society? Which of it is it to be? Or is it not certain?
Also is under the Infobox Race category is a Female Time Lord called a Time Lady because humans are sometimes called Man and a male human is also called a man but women is not a species name so is Time Lady?--Skittles the hog 19:35, 11 May 2008 (UTC)
-- This is better asked on the article on Time Lords, but from my understanding of it, the current canon is that "Time Lords" are a race, and that is how RTD expressed his opinion on the status of the Doctor as being a Time Lord, not "half-human/half Time Lord".BlackEarth 16:48, 4 June 2008 (UTC)
Time Lords not a race
from http://tardis.wikia.com/wiki/Time_Lady "Time Lords may also be referred to as Gallifreyans, though it is not certain if all Gallifreyans were Time Lords, or the Time Lords were only an elite echelon of Gallifreyan society." Jenny might genically be a Gallifreyan but is not trained as a Time Lord 64.129.127.5 17:09, 16 June 2008 (UTC)
if she has not been trained as a time lord that would explain why the doctor cant sense her like other time lords her "time brain" has not been telepathically trained
Inherited characteristics
Like her father, Jenny has two hearts. She also had reflexes, precision timing and acrobatic ability far beyond that of almost any Human. After her death, she shortly returned to life, expelling a "breath" of pure energy, though, unlike other Time Lords undergoing regeneration, she did not change physically. (DW: The Doctor's Daughter)it was due to her only being a few hours old that caused her to enter a healing trance like the doctor did in the christmas invasion
I've removed the last bit from the above quotation. In addition to improperly citing the Christmas Invasion, a complete lack of capitalization and a host of grammar mistakes, it does not cite anything to support the conclusion.
Fan conclusions are fun, and regardless of whether they may be right or not, this wiki isn't the place for them. --TheOmnius 13:52, 1 April 2009 (UTC)
