Toggle menu
Toggle personal menu
Not logged in
Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits.

Howling:"X is really Y" theories: why?

The Howling
Revision as of 05:55, 6 May 2010 by Falcotron (talk | contribs) (Created page with '{{Forumheader|The Howling}} <!-- Please put your content under this line. Be sure to sign your edits with four tildes: ~~~~ --> I'm curious why there are so many fan theories t…')
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
The Howling → "X is really Y" theories: why?
There be spoilers about un-released stories here.
Run back to the forums if you're scared.


I'm curious why there are so many fan theories that established character X is really earlier established character Y in disguise.

If the answer were just, "Because they've done it before," that would be that. But I can't think of any examples. Sure, often a newly-introduced character turns out to be the Master or Rassilon or whatever in that same story, but have they ever followed someone as a recurring character over multiple stories and then revealed him to be someone else? (Yeah, I know about Harold Saxon--but we didn't actually see him at all until Utopia, much less see him as a major character; he was a background plot detail that we kept hearing about.) But maybe I'm missing something obvious.

So, what _is_ the explanation? Why do people always think that the Rani, Romana, Susan, Jenny, the Monk, etc. will be introduced disguised as another major recurring character, when that's never happened before?

(I'm guessing Delton Menace's answer is going to be "because people are stupid", but I'm hoping for something that gives a little more insight. Why? Well, we know that SM, like RTD before him, has heard all these theories, and even jokes about them. I suspect he's also tried to figure out why. And he likes to play with people's expectations.) --Falcotron 05:55, May 6, 2010 (UTC)

Cookies help us deliver our services. By using our services, you agree to our use of cookies.