User:SOTO/Forum Archive/Inclusion debates/@comment-4028641-20170222073756/@comment-4028641-20170305051335

User:SOTO/Forum Archive/Inclusion debates/@comment-4028641-20170222073756/@comment-4028641-20170305051335 The reason LD is important to bring up is that:

A) It's the most DWU material we've seen from this franchise.

B) It's canon in the eyes of the people who make these films. The DWU in future films will likely match the game.

C) It's only invalid because of minor game mechanics that would make any Doctor Who game invalid. The consensus in the thread was pointing towards it being valid until I realized that there were in-game easter eggs that you could only activate through characters who were, by the logic of the cut scenes, not there to begin with.

D) LD is the modern home of most of the franchise's games. Especially those meant to tie-into the movies. Even the game-equivalent-novelisation was released via the game. There isn't going to be a non-LD franchise-based Lego game for a while, at least when it comes to things like Batman and the DWU.

E) There is never going to be a theoretical non-LD DWU game, because Lego doesn't do non-LD games anymore.

I don't really admire the suggestion that the "problem" is that I can't give you "real facts." I think I'm giving plenty of evidence for my case, and I simply am not able to understand what else you could be asking for. Facts can not be invalidated.

Also, it is not speculation to call the Phantom Zone a multi-dimension prison. It's clearly evident in the multiple doorways we see in the film. The author even said that was the point, and the fact that everyone uses the terminology of "Lego" exclusively from an out-of-universe point of view does nothing but confirm the name of the franchise.