User:SOTO/Forum Archive/Inclusion debates/@comment-5.2.105.85-20170222095120/@comment-5.2.105.85-20170223123633

From Tardis Wiki, the free Doctor Who reference
< User:SOTO‎ | Forum Archive‎ | Inclusion debates‎ | @comment-5.2.105.85-20170222095120
Revision as of 14:10, 27 April 2023 by SV7 (talk | contribs) (Bot: Automated import of articles)
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)

User:SOTO/Forum Archive/Inclusion debates/@comment-5.2.105.85-20170222095120/@comment-5.2.105.85-20170223123633

OttselSpy25 wrote: Eh these days I tend to sway between sides.

I would love to call DiT valid, I think the copyright argument is just poorly set-up, and I'm sure we could find quotes to change the tides. But at the same time, I wouldn't know how to explain the story. It's super badly written.

It's just hard for me to get super invested in a thread that I don't expect to be left open for very long.

If this story was deemed valid, it should go under the subheading "In the Seventh Doctor's Nightmare"

Followed by

This species/individual was once trapped in a time loop in the fictional land of EE. The dream was some what unstable which lead the Seventh Doctor to imagine all his companions were one and the same.

And so on..........

Retrieved from "https://tardis.wiki/w/index.php?title=User:SOTO/Forum_Archive/Inclusion_debates/@comment-5.2.105.85-20170222095120/@comment-5.2.105.85-20170223123633&oldid=3503278"