User:SOTO/Forum Archive/The Panopticon/@comment-31010985-20180428165444/@comment-31010985-20191212215810

From Tardis Wiki, the free Doctor Who reference
< User:SOTO‎ | Forum Archive‎ | The Panopticon/@comment-31010985-20180428165444
Revision as of 19:09, 27 April 2023 by SV7 (talk | contribs) (Bot: Automated import of articles)
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)

User:SOTO/Forum Archive/The Panopticon/@comment-31010985-20180428165444/@comment-31010985-20191212215810 I've never thought about it like this and I think you might be right. Tardis:Neutral point of view states that we give all media equal weight and that television is not the most important source of information here. It's strange to think that we could have been breaking our own policy on an issue as big as this for years.

Who are we to say that the characters and continuity established in An Unearthly Child are the "valid" ones when Dr. Who and the Dalek Movies continuity exists as a perfectly valid (by our own rules) but different Doctor Who universe. It seems that this has happened because the universe featured in An Unearthly Child is the most used one, but surely invalidating the Doctor Who universe established in Dr Who and the Daleks is breaking T:NPOV.

Retrieved from "https://tardis.wiki/w/index.php?title=User:SOTO/Forum_Archive/The_Panopticon/@comment-31010985-20180428165444/@comment-31010985-20191212215810&oldid=3516063"