User:SOTO/Forum Archive/Inclusion debates/@comment-4028641-20150906221018/@comment-1272640-20161123031819

From Tardis Wiki, the free Doctor Who reference
< User:SOTO‎ | Forum Archive‎ | Inclusion debates‎ | @comment-4028641-20150906221018
Revision as of 14:36, 27 April 2023 by SV7 (talk | contribs) (Bot: Automated text replacement (-'''User:(SOTO/Forum Archive)/(.*?)/\@comment-([\d\.]+)-(\d+)/\@comment-([\d\.]+)-(\d+)'''\n([\s\S]*)\[\[Category:SOTO archive posts\]\] +\7\2/\4-\3/\6-\5))
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)

Shambala108 wrote: Let's make something perfectly clear here. We do not re-open inclusion debates every time someone disagrees with an original decision or every time a new user joins and wants to know why something has been ruled invalid.

Furthermore, per Tardis:Do not disrupt this wiki to prove a point, and I quote: "Don't waste other editors' time by opening up discussions that are materially the same as other, concluded discussions. You may open up discussions on matters that have already been decided only when you have arguments which have not formed a part of that discussion, or other, precedent discussions on the same topic."

The Cushing films have long been considered invalid on this wiki. If that's all this thread has become, then it will be closed.

However, if we apply the retroactivity clause for First Frontier to deem Dimensions in Time invalid, by that same logic, the Cushing movies ARE valid because a later work says they are.

Retrieved from "https://tardis.wiki/w/index.php?title=User:SOTO/Forum_Archive/Inclusion_debates/@comment-4028641-20150906221018/@comment-1272640-20161123031819&oldid=3504855"