User:SOTO/Forum Archive/Inclusion debates/@comment-4028641-20151007072528/@comment-4189499-20171120080258

From Tardis Wiki, the free Doctor Who reference
< User:SOTO‎ | Forum Archive‎ | Inclusion debates‎ | @comment-4028641-20151007072528
Revision as of 14:40, 27 April 2023 by SV7 (talk | contribs) (Bot: Automated text replacement (-'''User:(SOTO/Forum Archive)/(.*?)/\@comment-([\d\.]+)-(\d+)/\@comment-([\d\.]+)-(\d+)'''\n([\s\S]*)\[\[Category:SOTO archive posts\]\] +\7\2/\4-\3/\6-\5))
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)

Shambala108 wrote: ... User:Imamadmad, who is not an admin, posted agreement with the thread. No other users expressed interest in the matter...

No I did not. In fact, I argued rather strongly that Doctor Who: Legacy (a game) should be included as the story line doesn't change in any way, shape, or form, based on what the user does. See also Thread:186659. And by the way, I still stand by the opinion that Legacy should be a valid source for the reasons I have written about many times before, especially at Thread:186659#23.

If it makes any difference, we consider it valid at DWA, as there are things which are definitely true about the story on every playing which can be cited.

Retrieved from "https://tardis.wiki/w/index.php?title=User:SOTO/Forum_Archive/Inclusion_debates/@comment-4028641-20151007072528/@comment-4189499-20171120080258&oldid=3505046"