4 December 2023
3 December 2023
no edit summary
+270
This sentence is confusing; it talks of a line of succession of some kind, but does not elaborate on the nature of the succession.
+9
no edit summary
−4
Terrible grammar.
−6
no edit summary
+9
Added the sentence back in and added Template:What? to it
+177
This sentence is confusing; it indicates a line of succession of some kind, but does not elaborate on the nature of the succession.
−177
2 December 2023
Protected "Isaac Newton": Page has been excessively vandalised ([Edit=Allow only autoconfirmed users] (expires 21:55, 16 December 2023 (UTC)))
mUndo revision 3667042 by Killgarraghforever (talk) Already discussed in the article.
−6
no edit summary
m+6
Undo revision 3667014 by Najawin (talk) How are you to decide that? This absolutely goes against NPOV. There are so many articles that prioritise other media over the TV show based on appearance
Undo revision 3667008 by 85.255.236.19 (talk) And? He's substantially more prominent than he is in the illustration or the accompanying story. NPOV would prioritize the tv show. I'm not out here prioritizing the TV show for Beep. But you're wrong on this.
Undo revision 3666999 by Najawin (talk) Newton is practically a background character in the TV story too and had no impact on the plot itself
Undo revision 3666986 by 85.255.236.19 (talk) NPOV doesn't mean we prioritize things that are temporally prior. Newton is a background figure and is not mentioned in the story accompanying the illustration. The TV depiction is more prominent.
Illustration was first, neutral point of view
no edit summary
+58
no edit summary
m+43
no edit summary
+156
no edit summary
+399
Undo revision 3666869 by 92.10.23.55 (talk)
−28
He's black now
+28
2 November 2023
27 December 2022
15 February 2022
27 August 2021
6 April 2021
7 March 2021
Scrooge MacDuck moved page HE0557-4840 to Isaac Newton without leaving a redirect
mHEBE3632 moved page Isaac Newton to HE0557-4840: CP
m