Toggle menu
Toggle preferences menu
Toggle personal menu
Not logged in
Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits.

User:SOTO/Forum Archive/Inclusion debates/@comment-37.225.52.51-20130510140359/@comment-26975268-20130513164916

From Tardis Wiki, the free Doctor Who reference
< User:SOTO‎ | Forum Archive‎ | Inclusion debates‎ | @comment-37.225.52.51-20130510140359
Revision as of 14:35, 27 April 2023 by SV7 (talk | contribs) (Bot: Automated text replacement (-'''User:(SOTO/Forum Archive)/(.*?)/\@comment-([\d\.]+)-(\d+)/\@comment-([\d\.]+)-(\d+)'''\n([\s\S]*)\[\[Category:SOTO archive posts\]\] +\7\2/\4-\3/\6-\5))
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)

But what if there's no mention of the contrafibularity flu in the original novel? I think we should cover both, but, if anything contradicts, the original novel takes precedence.

Hence, if both mention the flu, we only say that the Doctor caught it. If only the audio mentions the flu, then we say that Jason caught it.

I believe this is Tangerineduel's stance as well.

Cookies help us deliver our services. By using our services, you agree to our use of cookies.