Toggle menu
Toggle preferences menu
Toggle personal menu
Not logged in
Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits.

User:SOTO/Forum Archive/Inclusion debates/@comment-37.225.52.51-20130510140359/@comment-78.8.142.136-20130510174151

From Tardis Wiki, the free Doctor Who reference
< User:SOTO‎ | Forum Archive‎ | Inclusion debates‎ | @comment-37.225.52.51-20130510140359
Revision as of 14:35, 27 April 2023 by SV7 (talk | contribs) (Bot: Automated text replacement (-'''User:(SOTO/Forum Archive)/(.*?)/\@comment-([\d\.]+)-(\d+)/\@comment-([\d\.]+)-(\d+)'''\n([\s\S]*)\[\[Category:SOTO archive posts\]\] +\7\2/\4-\3/\6-\5))
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)

"Because the author has removed major characters which they can't legally use in their derivative work, then that work should be excluded from the wiki."

I wouldn't say they should be excluded from the wiki, even if they are not considered valid sources.

"It's not at all like K9 where there are just no clear references to the DWU, and the established DWU is often contradicted. Nor is it like Vienna, where Big Finish are clearly in the position to make it a DWU series, but have explicitly decided to go in a different direction."

OK, but why is then K9 covered, if it's contradictory to the established DWU and is not an official BBC-licensed spin-off? Also, I don't think Iris Wildthyme audios are really a Doctor Who spin-off, given that her character predates her inclusion in Doctor Who media, and I don't think her own solo stories actually reference the DWU. I haven't listened to Vienna yet, on the other hand, but it looks like her first solo adventure has quite a few references to Big Finish Doctor Who continuity, even if they don't mention the Doctor himself.

Cookies help us deliver our services. By using our services, you agree to our use of cookies.