Toggle menu
Toggle preferences menu
Toggle personal menu
Not logged in
Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits.

User:SOTO/Forum Archive/Inclusion debates/@comment-37.225.52.51-20130510140359/@comment-88790-20130511154423

From Tardis Wiki, the free Doctor Who reference
< User:SOTO‎ | Forum Archive‎ | Inclusion debates‎ | @comment-37.225.52.51-20130510140359
Revision as of 14:36, 27 April 2023 by SV7 (talk | contribs) (Bot: Automated text replacement (-'''User:(SOTO/Forum Archive)/(.*?)/\@comment-([\d\.]+)-(\d+)/\@comment-([\d\.]+)-(\d+)'''\n([\s\S]*)\[\[Category:SOTO archive posts\]\] +\7\2/\4-\3/\6-\5))
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)

I just don't really like the attitude of "we should wholly remove them from the wiki" and think excising them, removing them entirely from this wiki would be detrimental to our coverage.

I should have been more specific above, in saying that I think novel and audio are worthy of equal coverage on the wiki, and shouldn't be excised.

If we use the novelisation policy of "if there's a conflict between audio and novel the novel takes precedence". I can't see having a similar policy to the first series of Benny audios to be any more complicated than our policy with regard to novelisations.

The audios do build on Benny and Jason's characters which while they were developed in the Virgin novels gets a much quicker development in the audios.

Cookies help us deliver our services. By using our services, you agree to our use of cookies.