Toggle menu
Toggle preferences menu
Toggle personal menu
Not logged in
Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits.

User:SOTO/Forum Archive/Inclusion debates/@comment-4028641-20151007072528/@comment-1432718-20180116015635

From Tardis Wiki, the free Doctor Who reference
< User:SOTO‎ | Forum Archive‎ | Inclusion debates‎ | @comment-4028641-20151007072528
Revision as of 14:38, 27 April 2023 by SV7 (talk | contribs) (Bot: Automated text replacement (-'''User:(SOTO/Forum Archive)/(.*?)/\@comment-([\d\.]+)-(\d+)/\@comment-([\d\.]+)-(\d+)'''\n([\s\S]*)\[\[Category:SOTO archive posts\]\] +\7\2/\4-\3/\6-\5))
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)

After reading through all this discussion and looking through several pages for video games, my suggestion is as follows:

  • Declare all video games invalid for now.
  • If a user wants to bring up a specific game for validity, that game would get its own validity thread on this board. Most games are/should be invalid, so this isn't really as big a task as it sounds.

I think it's important that we don't ignore or overlook a very important part of existing policy: if a narrative is different for different users (stage plays, decide your destiny books, video games), then it can't be considered valid. Video games by their very nature give each user a different narrative.

Cookies help us deliver our services. By using our services, you agree to our use of cookies.