Toggle menu
Toggle preferences menu
Toggle personal menu
Not logged in
Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits.

User:SOTO/Forum Archive/Inclusion debates/@comment-4028641-20151007072528/@comment-4189499-20171120080258

From Tardis Wiki, the free Doctor Who reference
< User:SOTO‎ | Forum Archive‎ | Inclusion debates‎ | @comment-4028641-20151007072528
Revision as of 14:40, 27 April 2023 by SV7 (talk | contribs) (Bot: Automated text replacement (-'''User:(SOTO/Forum Archive)/(.*?)/\@comment-([\d\.]+)-(\d+)/\@comment-([\d\.]+)-(\d+)'''\n([\s\S]*)\[\[Category:SOTO archive posts\]\] +\7\2/\4-\3/\6-\5))
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)

Shambala108 wrote: ... User:Imamadmad, who is not an admin, posted agreement with the thread. No other users expressed interest in the matter...

No I did not. In fact, I argued rather strongly that Doctor Who: Legacy (a game) should be included as the story line doesn't change in any way, shape, or form, based on what the user does. See also Thread:186659. And by the way, I still stand by the opinion that Legacy should be a valid source for the reasons I have written about many times before, especially at Thread:186659#23.

If it makes any difference, we consider it valid at DWA, as there are things which are definitely true about the story on every playing which can be cited.

Cookies help us deliver our services. By using our services, you agree to our use of cookies.