Toggle menu
Toggle personal menu
Not logged in
Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits.

User:SOTO/Forum Archive/Inclusion debates/@comment-45692830-20200510214412/@comment-6032121-20200511002352

< User:SOTO‎ | Forum Archive‎ | Inclusion debates‎ | @comment-45692830-20200510214412
Revision as of 15:21, 27 April 2023 by SV7 (talk | contribs) (Bot: Automated text replacement (-'''User:(SOTO/Forum Archive)/(.*?)/\@comment-([\d\.]+)-(\d+)/\@comment-([\d\.]+)-(\d+)'''\n([\s\S]*)\[\[Category:SOTO archive posts\]\] +\7\2/\4-\3/\6-\5))
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)

Good question and good idea!

It's worth noting that from The Zygon Isolation, there isn't even any evidence that the "Tardis" website of which Osgood had a tab open is anything to do with the in-universe Doctor Who fiction series. It could be something like a LINDA-style online repository of all known TARDIS sightings throughout human history. Or something else entirely. We don't know! Nobody knows! Is there even a valid source defining the word wiki in the DWU?

But even if a future story showed our Wiki existing in the DWU in less ambiguous terms, I don't think that would lead to us having a "meta-wiki," as you put it, even if that is an interesting hypothetical. We don't, that I know of, create pages about individual entries within in-universe encyclopedias. Why should the in-universe text that would be this in-universe Tardis Wiki be any different?

We can live with one more-or-less thorough Tardis Data Core (The Zygon Isolation) page. It might require a slight addendum to the wording of T:TARDIS, perhaps, but that's all the policy changes I foresee being necessary.

Cookies help us deliver our services. By using our services, you agree to our use of cookies.