User:SOTO/Forum Archive/The Panopticon/@comment-4028641-20151008023030/@comment-27343779-20191105175435

User:SOTO/Forum Archive/The Panopticon/@comment-4028641-20151008023030/@comment-27343779-20191105175435 Here is a thread discussing whether Delgado and Pratt are the same incarnation based solely on Peel's book: Thread:167204

Also discussed there: Talk:The Master (Tersurus)

Honestly I find it quite unclear. You convinced me that it is ambiguous which incarantion would be the crispy Master in "Legacy of the Daleks" and as reminded to us by T:NPOV we should not discard it. The description of him being found by Goth clearly shows him to be the TV portrayal of Pratt and not the one of Beevers.

The skin was burnt and blackened, parts of the skeleton exposed. The face was blistered and warped, the eyes large and studying him unblinkingly.

If I understand your point correctly, then I may have found a new proposal, putting only Pratt's stories in the unclear section (with or without my proposal of putting all attempts at unnatural survival under Beevers as I understand it from BF's stance):

4)

• Early
• Dreyfus
• Delgado
• Beevers
• Ainley
• "John Smith"
• VNA
• Roberts
• Mastermind
• Macqueen
• Titan
• Jacobi
• Simm
• Gomez
• unclear (tipple, ...)
  • Pratt: Legacy of the Daleks * Deadly Assassin
• AU
  • Kisgart
  • Inferno
• NOTVALID

OR

5)

• Early
• Dreyfus
• Delgado
• Beevers
  • Ainley
  • VNA
  • Roberts
• Macqueen
• Titan
• Jacobi
• Simm
• Gomez
• unclear (tipple, ...)
  • Pratt: Legacy of the Daleks * Deadly Assassin
• AU
  • Kisgart
  • Inferno
• NOTVALID

OR, my 2nd proposal with your tweak (although i would prefer to avoid the "no regeneration" since you reminded us of some regeneration-like phrasing for both Ainley and the Tzun Masters):

6)

• Early
• Dreyfus
• Delgado
• {{Beevers|Out of regeneration}} / {{Beevers|Survival}}
  • Pratt
  • Ainley
  • VNA
  • Roberts
• Macqueen
• Titan
• Jacobi
• Simm
• Gomez
• unclear (Tipple ...)
• AU
  • Kisgart
  • Inferno
• NOTVALID