Toggle menu
Toggle personal menu
Not logged in
Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits.

User:SOTO/Forum Archive/The Panopticon/@comment-121.45.54.78-20130925110520/@comment-38288735-20191120162843

< User:SOTO‎ | Forum Archive‎ | The Panopticon/@comment-121.45.54.78-20130925110520
Revision as of 20:05, 27 April 2023 by SV7 (talk | contribs) (Bot: Automated text replacement (-'''User:(SOTO/Forum Archive)/(.*?)/\@comment-([\d\.]+)-(\d+)/\@comment-([\d\.]+)-(\d+)'''\n([\s\S]*)\[\[Category:SOTO archive posts\]\] +\7\2/\4-\3/\6-\5))
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)

Hm. I interpreted it as the Solitract taking her form, but your interpretation doesn't raise red flags for me going from memory.

Regardless of the individual case, would you say that, if it were clear that it were the Solitract and not Grace, that it should not be counted as an appearance of Grace? Any policy is going to have borderline cases requiring discussion (as this very well may be), but would you say that the concept behind that policy proposal is sound? The overall policy is really the point of this thread.

Cookies help us deliver our services. By using our services, you agree to our use of cookies.