Toggle menu
Toggle preferences menu
Toggle personal menu
Not logged in
Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits.

User:SOTO/Forum Archive/The Panopticon/@comment-1783865-20200302103744/@comment-6032121-20200305123355

From Tardis Wiki, the free Doctor Who reference
< User:SOTO‎ | Forum Archive‎ | The Panopticon/@comment-1783865-20200302103744
Revision as of 21:20, 27 April 2023 by SV7 (talk | contribs) (Bot: Automated text replacement (-'''User:(SOTO/Forum Archive)/(.*?)/\@comment-([\d\.]+)-(\d+)/\@comment-([\d\.]+)-(\d+)'''\n([\s\S]*)\[\[Category:SOTO archive posts\]\] +\7\2/\4-\3/\6-\5))
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)

Ack, sorry. I am sort of snappish these days because for obvious reasons, people who go "the Timeless Child has been on television now, which overwrites the Other and all that nonsense, Chibnall is the One True Canon", even unconsciously, rub me the wrong way — and there have been a lot such people cropping up on the Internet since last Sunday. Sorry to sort of project that on you if you're not one of that lot.

And to be clearer, what I was disputing was more that The Timeless Children should have any impact in particular on how we cover the Morbius Doctors, not that the Morbius Doctors could reasonably reckoned to be immediately pre-Hartnell. I'm not sure what you mean by “no one said all pre-Hartnell versions of the character were the Timeless Child, just that they weren't "the Doctor"”, either. What evidence do you have of that? I mean, our page is currently called The Doctor (The Brain of Morbius), which rather implies that as far as we know those regenerations did call themselves Doctor.

Cookies help us deliver our services. By using our services, you agree to our use of cookies.