Toggle menu
Toggle preferences menu
Toggle personal menu
Not logged in
Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits.

User:SOTO/Forum Archive/The Panopticon/@comment-1783865-20200302103744/@comment-6032121-20200330224931

From Tardis Wiki, the free Doctor Who reference
< User:SOTO‎ | Forum Archive‎ | The Panopticon/@comment-1783865-20200302103744
Revision as of 21:20, 27 April 2023 by SV7 (talk | contribs) (Bot: Automated text replacement (-'''User:(SOTO/Forum Archive)/(.*?)/\@comment-([\d\.]+)-(\d+)/\@comment-([\d\.]+)-(\d+)'''\n([\s\S]*)\[\[Category:SOTO archive posts\]\] +\7\2/\4-\3/\6-\5))
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)

Is there a reason why you two are completely disregarding our earlier progresses? And I still don't know what you all have against the "More…" link, which seemed a good compromise betwee T:NPOV and practical concerns.

For one thing, the Morbius Doctors definitely belong in "More ambiguous," what with the possibility that they're faces of the Other, not of the Doctor.

And the fact that Faction Paradox contradicts other stories is neither here nor there; that's not what "More ambiguous" means. (Also, please tell me in what Faction Paradox stories the 'Relic' Doctor appeared? I mean, Alien Bodies is "a Faction Paradox story" in that the Faction is in it, but it's not part of the series as such. Which series does not have the license to use the Doctor.)

Cookies help us deliver our services. By using our services, you agree to our use of cookies.