Toggle menu
Toggle preferences menu
Toggle personal menu
Not logged in
Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits.

The Panopticon/Mr Men stories: novels or short stories

From Tardis Wiki, the free Doctor Who reference
< User:SOTO‎ | Forum Archive
Revision as of 22:34, 27 April 2023 by SV7 (talk | contribs) (Bot: Automated text replacement (-'''User:(SOTO/Forum Archive)/(.*?)/\@comment-([\d\.]+)-(\d+)'''\n([\s\S]*)\[\[Category:SOTO archive posts\]\] +\5\2/\4-\3, -'''User:(SOTO/Forum Archive)/(.*?)/\@comment-(.*?)'''([\s\S]*) ?\{\{retitle\|///(.*?)\}\} +{{retitle|\2/\5}}\n'''User:\1/\2/@comment-\3'''\4))
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)

So we now definitively know that these stories are valid. However, the designation Dr. Twelfth (novel) really seems wrong. The definitions from T:DAB TERM are as follows:

  • novel: "out-of-universe discussion about a DWU novel";
  • short story: "out-of-universe articles about DWU short stories".

In other words, not helpful in this case.

But here is the standard meaning of the word "novel" from M-W: "an invented prose narrative that is usually long and complex and deals especially with human experience through a usually connected sequence of events" (boldface: Amorkuz).

To me the Mr Men stories are very clearly "short stories". They are nowhere near the length of a novel, the narrative complexity of a novel, or the minimal age for being able to comprehend of a novel.

Cookies help us deliver our services. By using our services, you agree to our use of cookies.