Toggle search
Toggle menu
114.3K
74.3K
24.2K
3.7M
Tardis Wiki
Toggle preferences menu
Toggle personal menu
Not logged in
Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits.

User:SOTO/Forum Archive/The Panopticon/@comment-25041817-20151024182247/@comment-5918438-20151025185227

From Tardis Wiki, the free Doctor Who reference
More actions
< User:SOTO‎ | Forum Archive‎ | The Panopticon/@comment-25041817-20151024182247
Revision as of 22:35, 27 April 2023 by SV7 (talk | contribs) (Bot: Automated text replacement (-'''User:(SOTO/Forum Archive)/(.*?)/\@comment-([\d\.]+)-(\d+)/\@comment-([\d\.]+)-(\d+)'''\n([\s\S]*)\[\[Category:SOTO archive posts\]\] +\7\2/\4-\3/\6-\5))
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)

I'm glad you two were able to move past the conflict. On the topic of the thread: I agree with Mewiet and Skittles, in that the only info on specific Doctors' pages should be information related to that incarnation of the Doctor. If it doesn't involve that incarnation, it doesn't belong on that particular article. On an article on regeneration, or the Doctor's regeneration? Sure! It might be cool to look at all the regenerations and near-regenerations in one place. But the only info about the previous Doctor that belongs on a given Doctor page is the leadup to the regeneration into them.

Retrieved from "https://tardis.wiki/w/index.php?title=User:SOTO/Forum_Archive/The_Panopticon/@comment-25041817-20151024182247/@comment-5918438-20151025185227&oldid=3527235"
Cookies help us deliver our services. By using our services, you agree to our use of cookies.
More information