OttselSpy25 wrote: Is anyone against combining the three articles?
It makes things a lot less confusing, but we'd still have the issue of Mark II/Mark 2, even if Mark 2 doesn't have its own article.
OttselSpy25 wrote: Is anyone against combining the three articles?
It makes things a lot less confusing, but we'd still have the issue of Mark II/Mark 2, even if Mark 2 doesn't have its own article.