Toggle menu
Toggle personal menu
Not logged in
Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits.

The Panopticon/How The Monk Got His Habit (rename)

< User:SOTO‎ | Forum Archive
Revision as of 23:43, 27 April 2023 by SV7 (talk | contribs) (Bot: Automated text replacement (-'''User:(SOTO/Forum Archive)/(.*?)/\@comment-([\d\.]+)-(\d+)'''\n([\s\S]*)\[\[Category:SOTO archive posts\]\] +\5\2/\4-\3, -'''User:(SOTO/Forum Archive)/(.*?)/\@comment-(.*?)'''([\s\S]*) ?\{\{retitle\|///(.*?)\}\} +{{retitle|\2/\5}}\n'''User:\1/\2/@comment-\3'''\4))
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)

How The Monk Got His Habit (short story) should be merged into How The Monk Got His Habit (novelisation), because no short story existed - just an extract of the unproduced novelisation.

Peter Harness's comments revealed the extract to be a "discarded first page of a novelisation" that he only shared because "some of you seemed to appreciate the discarded Meddling Monk idea". [1]

User:Shambala108 ruled that we were to believe Harness' comments about the novelisation having existed, and having been discarded, here;

"The author's use (twice) of the word "discarded" simplifies things: we do not consider unpublished stories to be valid. None of the arguments for validity were able to get around this fact."

so i do not wish to see continued "if we are to believe Harness" when it has been ruled that we are to believe him. according to this site the novelisation existed, and according to Harness this was only an extract and not written as a short story.

Cookies help us deliver our services. By using our services, you agree to our use of cookies.