Toggle menu
Toggle personal menu
Not logged in
Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits.

User:SOTO/Forum Archive/The Panopticon/@comment-5.173.129.25-20130511233914/@comment-188432-20130512133157

< User:SOTO‎ | Forum Archive‎ | The Panopticon/@comment-5.173.129.25-20130511233914
Revision as of 23:47, 27 April 2023 by SV7 (talk | contribs) (Bot: Automated text replacement (-'''User:(SOTO/Forum Archive)/(.*?)/\@comment-([\d\.]+)-(\d+)/\@comment-([\d\.]+)-(\d+)'''\n([\s\S]*)\[\[Category:SOTO archive posts\]\] +\7\2/\4-\3/\6-\5))
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)

31.61.129.104 wrote: You were in favor of merging the articles in a different discussion anyway, even before Nigthmare.

And I still am, personally. But as an admin I have a sometimes burdensome "duty of care" over previous discussions. Because we have arrived at the current setup through discussion, we can't just switch it on a dime without clear narrative evidence.

Moreover changing to one article would require a good amount of work, mostly on my part. Since I care so very little for the Cybes personally, I want to make sure that the editorial plan we have for making such a large structural change is sound.

I am not opposed to a single article. You'll note the tone of regret in my initial post. I'm opposed to a single article which is written on the basis of invalid sources.

Jagoandlitefoot said: ...shouldn't we actually take it at face value that the Cyber-Fleet now consists of Cybermen of both Cybus and non-Cybus origin?

Could you clarify what you mean by this? What "face value"? Simply the fact that some have "C"s on their chest and some don't?

Cookies help us deliver our services. By using our services, you agree to our use of cookies.