Toggle menu
Toggle preferences menu
Toggle personal menu
Not logged in
Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits.

Talk:Transformer (robot)

Discussion page

Move

Misspoke, clearly they're robots from the name. But there's no evidence connecting a larger organization to individual members. This is a single line in a book. You want to use a different page. Najawin 03:42, 8 May 2023 (UTC)

No I don't. For the same reason we don't need six pages for Martin Luther King just because each story doesn't use the same name. OS25🤙☎️ 03:45, 8 May 2023 (UTC)
I am now finished with my revisions to the page. I assume most of your assumptions about my edits predate me actual finishing my work on the article. OS25🤙☎️ 03:50, 8 May 2023 (UTC)
No, I assumed it was going to be something like this. I completely and unilaterally stand behind my statement. It's clear from the context of the statement made by Primo that he's referring to an organization or group rather than a species of being. Unless you have an IU source connecting the two, they need to be separated. Najawin 03:55, 8 May 2023 (UTC)
Indeed, it's impossible to have both on the same page, since the page as it was written had the category "organization", and your rewrite, ostensibly, would change what categories it was in to something else. These are just two different things - it's a category error, you're confusing an organized group of these creatures with the species itself. Najawin 03:59, 8 May 2023 (UTC)
What do we have to gain by lying and claiming that the Transformers who make up Galvatron and Unicron and the "Transformers" who are "robots in disguise" are different Transformers? Again, this is the same as the old debate to have Martin Luther King as three separate pages. This is the sort of terrible reading of T:NO RW that makes me thing we need it rewritten at this point. OS25🤙☎️ 04:02, 8 May 2023 (UTC)
Cookies help us deliver our services. By using our services, you agree to our use of cookies.