More actions
Intended use
Is the intended use case for this category all images of human characters that don't otherwise have enough images to have their own category? Also, should this category have every human character image category as a subcategory (like how numerous other species-specific image categories seem to operate)? Look-a-troopa ☎ 02:07, 31 March 2024 (UTC)
- This category possibly violates T:OVER-CAT, specifically as an example of being "too broad". Though I don't have any strong opinions there. But if it is allowed, then yes, other categories for photos of specific humans should be placed here. Danochy ☎ 02:44, 31 March 2024 (UTC)
- It absolutely violates T:OVER-CAT, sorry. There's a human in almost every DWU story.
× SOTO (☎/✍/↯) 04:48, 31 March 2024 (UTC)- I agree, but I was avoiding being definitive, since there seems to be an exception for image categories. For example, Category:TARDIS images has existed for a long time — although that category is probably justified for other reasons, i.e. it's useful to collect pictures of the TARDIS in one place for editing purposes. Humans... maybe less so. Danochy ☎ 09:05, 31 March 2024 (UTC)
- It absolutely violates T:OVER-CAT, sorry. There's a human in almost every DWU story.