More actions
Non-canon?
Why is this not part of the Doctor Who universe as well? As with Ninth Doctor (The Curse of Fatal Death), unless there is something that directly contradicts the TV show, I don't see how it isn't part of the DWU? It comes from what we consider to be a canon source, and as far as I know, doesn't contradict anything. Does anyone disagree? --The Thirteenth Doctor 23:22, October 2, 2010 (UTC)
- We're maybe slightly inconsistent with what unlicensed productions we present on this wiki. It was a shock to see the edits of unregistered users adding all this Audio Visuals material to the page when creating a page at the Doctor Who Expanded wiki and adding a link at the bottom to this page would be more appropriate. They really need the page!
- Unless Party Animals wasn't canon, it is hard to imagine how this guy isn't, though.
--Nyktimos 23:58, October 2, 2010 (UTC)
- It is part of the DW universe as far as the BBV and DWM stuff goes, any information gleaned from the Audio Visuals stuff isn't canon and therefore shouldn't be included. As Nyktimos says we can link out to DW Expanded with this information. --Tangerineduel 13:32, October 3, 2010 (UTC)
Moved AV content to DWE wiki. --Nyktimos 03:20, October 5, 2010 (UTC)
- Wow. What a mess. See, what's happened here is that people have made the mistake of believing that if it's a Doctor-like character played by Nick Briggs, it's all the same as the guy in Party Animals. And that's in no way true.
- The Party Animals Doctor appeared in one thing and one thing only: Party Animals. Is Animals canonical? I think that's at least up for debate. It certainly reads like a parody to me. I mean, Bart Simpson does appear in it, for cryin' out loud. It's really rather the comics equivalent of this year's opening NTA sketch. Or Dimensions in Time.
- The AV Doctor is quite beyond our remit. He's fully fan fiction and therefore in no way to be examined by this wiki.
- The BBV "Doctor" isn't the Doctor at all. He's a character named Fred, who may well bear a striking similarity to the Doctor, but obviously can't be the Doctor. BBV had no permission to make fiction involving the Doctor, so therefore Fred is not the Doctor. Our tardis:canon policy needs clarification on this point, but BBV should be considered canonical only as far as they use characters and races for which they received legal clearance from a rights holder. At no point did the BBC ever clear the usage of the Doctor. Just didn't happen. So trying to equate "Fred" with "the Doctor" is a nonsense. A new article at Fred (which I've just made a broken redirect) needs to be written.
czechout<staff /> ☎ ✍
- Wow. What a mess. See, what's happened here is that people have made the mistake of believing that if it's a Doctor-like character played by Nick Briggs, it's all the same as the guy in Party Animals. And that's in no way true.
Rename
I've put this up for a rename as since the Audio Visuals are not canon, we'll need another way to identify him. I suppose it would be The Doctor (Party Animals). The Thirteenth Doctor 14:46, October 4, 2010 (UTC)
- That seems like the best disambig name to go with. --Tangerineduel 14:48, October 4, 2010 (UTC)
Fred, Cyber Hunt Vital Signs
Is it enough that the character of Fred is played by Nick Briggs to say 'Fred' the amnesiac traveller and this Doctor are the same individual? In the article it's fairly vague about whether or not it is. --Tangerineduel 15:44, October 4, 2010 (UTC)
- Per this interview with Briggs that was apparently Bill Baggs' intent, but the result is less clear on the matter by design. Possibly worth noting under "Behind the scenes," if not the canon section? Rob T Firefly 19:56, October 4, 2010 (UTC)
- I think place it in the behind the scenes. It's fairly unclear, unless there's something really definite to connect them. --Tangerineduel 14:18, October 5, 2010 (UTC)