Toggle menu
Toggle preferences menu
Toggle personal menu
Not logged in
Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits.

Forum:Overhaul of featured article nominations

The Cloisters
Revision as of 17:44, 23 July 2011 by Skittles the hog (talk | contribs) (Created page with "{{Forumheader|Panopticon}} <!-- Please put your content under this line. Be sure to sign your edits with four tildes ~~~~ --> I would like to suggest that the current procedure ...")
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
IndexPanopticon → Overhaul of featured article nominations
Spoilers are strongly policed here.
If this thread's title doesn't specify it's spoilery, don't bring any up.

I would like to suggest that the current procedure at Project:Feature Article nominations is changed. At the moment, it seems to much as if anything goes. I'm sure this is eventually regulated before the article is chosen, but to take August's nominations as an example, none of them are really of great quality. Utopia (that's the planet, not the episode) has a cleanup tag, Jack Harkness has a complete imbalance of information with about two lines for some episodes and two pages for others. White Darkness is somewhat viable, but has far too many red links to be featured.

What I'm proposing is that the nominations are done in a discussion style, where feedback can be given leading to article improvement. The voting doesn't work in any case as most people nominate and then forget to vote or place their vote in the wrong place. Thoughts?--Skittles the hog - talk 17:44, July 23, 2011 (UTC)

Cookies help us deliver our services. By using our services, you agree to our use of cookies.