no edit summary
Bold Clone (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 186: | Line 186: | ||
@Badwolff: Well, Moffat has already given us fans a new twist that has caused us to completely reevaluate the show: John Hurt. And considering that "John Hurt is both an older and established actor who continues to have ongoing acting projects," it actually makes sense to me for Hurt to be another, previously unknown incarnation. This way, he only has to appear in a single multi-Doctor story as a past Doctor, while still carrying the full impact of his secret "plot twist" identity (some sort of "lost" Doctor or what not). Sorta like maximum effect with minimal effort. Make any sense? --[[User:Bold Clone|<span style="color:darkblue">'''Bold'''</span>]] [[User Talk:Bold Clone|<span style="color:gold">'''Clone'''</span>]] 05:16, May 25, 2013 (UTC) | @Badwolff: Well, Moffat has already given us fans a new twist that has caused us to completely reevaluate the show: John Hurt. And considering that "John Hurt is both an older and established actor who continues to have ongoing acting projects," it actually makes sense to me for Hurt to be another, previously unknown incarnation. This way, he only has to appear in a single multi-Doctor story as a past Doctor, while still carrying the full impact of his secret "plot twist" identity (some sort of "lost" Doctor or what not). Sorta like maximum effect with minimal effort. Make any sense? --[[User:Bold Clone|<span style="color:darkblue">'''Bold'''</span>]] [[User Talk:Bold Clone|<span style="color:gold">'''Clone'''</span>]] 05:16, May 25, 2013 (UTC) | ||
I don't know if it makes sense to Badwolff but it does to me. --[[Special:Contributions/89.242.70.240|89.242.70.240]]<sup>[[User talk:89.242.70.240#top|talk to me]]</sup> 09:55, May 25, 2013 (UTC) | |||