Tech, Bureaucrats, emailconfirmed, Administrators (Semantic MediaWiki), Curators (Semantic MediaWiki), Suppressors, Administrators, threadmoderator
114,056
edits
More actions
→Section headings: new section
Tag: sourceedit |
(→Section headings: new section) Tag: sourceedit |
||
| Line 272: | Line 272: | ||
::And I'm speaking as a bot operator here, in case you haven't noticed. Believe me, there is no such issue.{{User:SOTO/sig}} 02:32, October 30, 2016 (UTC) | ::And I'm speaking as a bot operator here, in case you haven't noticed. Believe me, there is no such issue.{{User:SOTO/sig}} 02:32, October 30, 2016 (UTC) | ||
:::I once mistakenly thought that was recursion as well. As I said in the message from January, while it wouldn't be recursion, it would be redundant to add [[:category:Writers]] as well as [[:category:Human writers]], for example. Because at no point was that person a writer but not human, it's simply redundant to put them in both. It would be redundant to put a story page into [[:category:Stories set in Cardiff]] and [[:category:Stories set in Wales]] if that story never leaves Cardiff at all. But if it takes place both in Cardiff and on the Welsh countryside, you absolutely ''should'' add both.{{User:SOTO/sig}} 02:46, October 30, 2016 (UTC) | :::I once mistakenly thought that was recursion as well. As I said in the message from January, while it wouldn't be recursion, it would be redundant to add [[:category:Writers]] as well as [[:category:Human writers]], for example. Because at no point was that person a writer but not human, it's simply redundant to put them in both. It would be redundant to put a story page into [[:category:Stories set in Cardiff]] and [[:category:Stories set in Wales]] if that story never leaves Cardiff at all. But if it takes place both in Cardiff and on the Welsh countryside, you absolutely ''should'' add both.{{User:SOTO/sig}} 02:46, October 30, 2016 (UTC) | ||
== Section headings == | |||
Small enough thing, but please remember to use sentence case in section headings, so <code>Behind the scenes</code> instead of <code>Behind the Scenes</code> and not to use a level 3 heading, ie. <code>===</code>, when there is not already a level 2, ie. <code>==</code>. | |||
So: | |||
:<code>== Behind the scenes ==</code> | |||
Not: | |||
:<code>=== Behind the Scenes ===</code> | |||
Take a look at [[T:HEAD]] for more information. Thanks.{{User:SOTO/sig}} 22:18, November 3, 2016 (UTC) | |||