emailconfirmed, Administrators
129,644
edits
More actions
Tardis:Section headings
(→Fossil: new section) |
Shambala108 (talk | contribs) Tag: sourceedit |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
=Mercy= | == Mercy == | ||
Hmm. Just an open question. It had said that all its data bases showed that all freinds of the Doctor would show mercy.... Is this in error since there are some who would not (Other than River Song) Or is it because of time bing erased?[[User:Ominic|Ominic]] 21:30, June 26, 2010 (UTC) | Hmm. Just an open question. It had said that all its data bases showed that all freinds of the Doctor would show mercy.... Is this in error since there are some who would not (Other than River Song) Or is it because of time bing erased?[[User:Ominic|Ominic]] 21:30, June 26, 2010 (UTC) | ||
| Line 6: | Line 5: | ||
On a similar topic, I don't think it's the first Dalek to say "mercy," actually. Didn't the imprisoned Dalek in the Dalek TV story cry "Mercy!" when the 9th Doctor electrocuted it? [[User:Chenrezi|Chenrezi]] 01:28, June 27, 2010 (UTC) | On a similar topic, I don't think it's the first Dalek to say "mercy," actually. Didn't the imprisoned Dalek in the Dalek TV story cry "Mercy!" when the 9th Doctor electrocuted it? [[User:Chenrezi|Chenrezi]] 01:28, June 27, 2010 (UTC) | ||
The Dalek from the 'Dalek' TV story cried "have pity" rather than "mercy". It was a play on one of the original Davros' final lines to the Daleks in his first apearance. [[Special:Contributions/82.23.86.207|82.23.86.207]] 15:31, June 27, 2010 (UTC)Ghadius | The Dalek from the 'Dalek' TV story cried "have pity" rather than "mercy". It was a play on one of the original Davros' final lines to the Daleks in his first apearance. [[Special:Contributions/82.23.86.207|82.23.86.207]] 15:31, June 27, 2010 (UTC)Ghadius | ||
*and that one was insane due to everything it had gone through.--[[User:WarGrowlmon18|WarGrowlmon18]] 16:58, June 27, 2010 (UTC) | *and that one was insane due to everything it had gone through.--[[User:WarGrowlmon18|WarGrowlmon18]] 16:58, June 27, 2010 (UTC) | ||
Right I knew that but what about others? [[User:Ominic|Ominic]] 16:39, June 27, 2010 (UTC) | Right I knew that but what about others? [[User:Ominic|Ominic]] 16:39, June 27, 2010 (UTC) | ||
Did River Song kill this Stone Dalek? While we see the River confront and threaten it as it begs for mercy. We have witnessed Daleks being shot by companions before (Mickey) so why not show it this time? We don't even get to hear an explosion or see smoke, the low budget options, so is this part of Rivers' riddle? | Did River Song kill this Stone Dalek? While we see the River confront and threaten it as it begs for mercy. We have witnessed Daleks being shot by companions before (Mickey) so why not show it this time? We don't even get to hear an explosion or see smoke, the low budget options, so is this part of Rivers' riddle? | ||
| Line 33: | Line 26: | ||
It's possible this is the Eternal Dalek which would give meaning to it's name [[User:Oni Dark Link|<font color="#66FFFF">Oni</font>]] [[Special:Editcount/Oni Dark Link|<font color="#7F007F">Dark </font>]] [[User:Oni Dark Link/Curiosity Trading one or two?|<font color="#007A00">Link</font>]] 18:20, June 27, 2010 (UTC) | It's possible this is the Eternal Dalek which would give meaning to it's name [[User:Oni Dark Link|<font color="#66FFFF">Oni</font>]] [[Special:Editcount/Oni Dark Link|<font color="#7F007F">Dark </font>]] [[User:Oni Dark Link/Curiosity Trading one or two?|<font color="#007A00">Link</font>]] 18:20, June 27, 2010 (UTC) | ||
I thought that too. When the Pandorica partially regenerated it, I was half expecting the stone to give way to yellow... um... well, let's be honest, the new Daleks are blatantly ''plastic''. Anyway, sadly not... so the Eternal remains an enigma --[[User:Sorceror Nobody|Sorceror Nobody]] 15:57, June 28, 2010 (UTC) | I thought that too. When the Pandorica partially regenerated it, I was half expecting the stone to give way to yellow... um... well, let's be honest, the new Daleks are blatantly ''plastic''. Anyway, sadly not... so the Eternal remains an enigma --[[User:Sorceror Nobody|Sorceror Nobody]] 15:57, June 28, 2010 (UTC) | ||