emailconfirmed, Administrators
129,644
edits
no edit summary
OttselSpy25 (talk | contribs) No edit summary Tag: sourceedit |
Shambala108 (talk | contribs) No edit summary Tag: sourceedit |
||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
:Well, in truth this whole category likely fails [[T:CAT NAMES|our rule to make sure that category names are unambiguous]]. There's no real definition of the word "superweapon" -- indeed, is it "superweapon" or "super weapon"? -- in the DWU. So, to my mind, the question is really, "Why does this category exist?" -- not "Why is <insert name here> not on the list?" {{user:CzechOut/Sig}}{{User:CzechOut/TimeFormat}} 12:03: Fri 21 Apr 2017</span> | :Well, in truth this whole category likely fails [[T:CAT NAMES|our rule to make sure that category names are unambiguous]]. There's no real definition of the word "superweapon" -- indeed, is it "superweapon" or "super weapon"? -- in the DWU. So, to my mind, the question is really, "Why does this category exist?" -- not "Why is <insert name here> not on the list?" {{user:CzechOut/Sig}}{{User:CzechOut/TimeFormat}} 12:03: Fri 21 Apr 2017</span> | ||
:: I agree. "''Superweapon''" is just very odd and specific, it can mean everything and nothing. Surely it's not exactly a term universally used by all writers, and I doubt anyone has a very clear definition of what it means. [[User:OttselSpy25|OS25]] ([[User Talk:OttselSpy25|Talk]]) 12:51, April 21, 2017 (UTC) | :: I agree. "''Superweapon''" is just very odd and specific, it can mean everything and nothing. Surely it's not exactly a term universally used by all writers, and I doubt anyone has a very clear definition of what it means. [[User:OttselSpy25|OS25]] ([[User Talk:OttselSpy25|Talk]]) 12:51, April 21, 2017 (UTC) | ||
:::Agreed. [[User:Shambala108|Shambala108]] [[User talk:Shambala108|<span title="Talk to me">☎</span>]] 13:37, April 21, 2017 (UTC) | |||