25,433
edits
→Pure historical?: Muddy historical
MystExplorer (talk | contribs) No edit summary Tag: sourceedit |
(→Pure historical?: Muddy historical) Tag: sourceedit |
||
| Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
I'd have to do a rewatch to find out if it's confirmed whether or not the creature is terrestrial, but should this be deemed a '''pseudo-historical story''' or a '''pure historical'''?{{User:SOTO/sig}} 16:06, April 30, 2017 (UTC) | I'd have to do a rewatch to find out if it's confirmed whether or not the creature is terrestrial, but should this be deemed a '''pseudo-historical story''' or a '''pure historical'''?{{User:SOTO/sig}} 16:06, April 30, 2017 (UTC) | ||
::Even if the creature is not an alien per se, it's still something that doesn't exist in the real world and that's usually enough to qualify as a pseudo-historical.[[User:MystExplorer|MystExplorer]] [[User talk:MystExplorer|<span title="Talk to me">☎</span>]] 16:09, April 30, 2017 (UTC) | ::Even if the creature is not an alien per se, it's still something that doesn't exist in the real world and that's usually enough to qualify as a pseudo-historical.[[User:MystExplorer|MystExplorer]] [[User talk:MystExplorer|<span title="Talk to me">☎</span>]] 16:09, April 30, 2017 (UTC) | ||
::: If that's not enough, also the excrement fuel that was used by Lord Sutcliffe was more powerful than what existed in reality. I say: pseudo-historical. [[User:Amorkuz|Amorkuz]] [[User talk:Amorkuz|<span title="Talk to me">☎</span>]] 23:05, May 1, 2017 (UTC) | |||