4,017
edits
More actions
Forum:Should we add an appearances section to story articles? (edit)
Revision as of 06:25, 2 October 2009
, 2 October 2009no edit summary
(reply) |
Bigredrabbit (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
| Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
:This is what the references section in the article does. It lists and gives ''context'' to the references made within the article. It would be redundant to include such things like the main characters as they are obviously listed in the cast list. The references section already (should) divide things into categories and gives forth information to the reader. --[[User:Tangerineduel|Tangerineduel]] 06:16, September 30, 2009 (UTC) | :This is what the references section in the article does. It lists and gives ''context'' to the references made within the article. It would be redundant to include such things like the main characters as they are obviously listed in the cast list. The references section already (should) divide things into categories and gives forth information to the reader. --[[User:Tangerineduel|Tangerineduel]] 06:16, September 30, 2009 (UTC) | ||
::However, the References sections are used basically used as Story Notes. I believe that the Appearances must exist. Whether it is under the name References or Appearances, a list of Individuals, Species and Locations is neccesary. The Cast lists do not state every character that appears, merely the ones that talk. The Doctor's TARDIS appears in every episode, yet isn't in the Cast once. Therefore, I believe that the list is neccesary. [[User:Bigredrabbit|Bigredrabbit]] 06:25, October 2, 2009 (UTC) | |||