Tech, Bureaucrats, emailconfirmed, Administrators (Semantic MediaWiki), Curators (Semantic MediaWiki), Suppressors, Administrators, threadmoderator
119,580
edits
(Created page with "I don't think this should be designated a Fifth Doctor story. It was clearly Rudden's intention to have the Doctor's incarnation ambiguous - he even uses gender-neutral prono...") |
No edit summary |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
== Fifth Doctor? == | |||
I don't think this should be designated a Fifth Doctor story. | I don't think this should be designated a Fifth Doctor story. | ||
Line 6: | Line 7: | ||
But in any case, the illustration is just an artistic interpretation of the theme. I mean, in the audiobook edition the Master is given a Scottish accent, which makes the Delgado identification equally tricky - that's just the reader's artistic interpretation. I'd say privilege Rudden's stated intention over either. | But in any case, the illustration is just an artistic interpretation of the theme. I mean, in the audiobook edition the Master is given a Scottish accent, which makes the Delgado identification equally tricky - that's just the reader's artistic interpretation. I'd say privilege Rudden's stated intention over either. | ||
:I'm not seeing gender-neutral language here. Definitely he/him pronouns. In any case, authorial intent is not really a [[T:VS|valid source]] for in-universe information. That said, we can definitely look further into the evidence.{{User:SOTO/sig}} 20:02, November 30, 2018 (UTC) |
edits