Forum:Book Plots: Difference between revisions

Forum:Book Plots (edit)

Revision as of 14:04, 28 November 2009

1,330 bytes added , 28 November 2009

no edit summary

Tangerineduel

Tech, Bureaucrats, emailconfirmed, Suppressors, Administrators

68,734

edits

@@ Line 2: / Line 2: @@
 <!-- Please put your content under this line.  Be sure to sign your edits with four tildes: ~~~~ -->
 Right, I know I'm probally nitpicking, but seeing as we have little in the way to do except Dreamland and mantenice, couldn't we try to develope the pages about novels? Just a thought - [[User:Excalibur-117|Excalibur-117]] 18:49, November 27, 2009 (UTC)
+:Well, little in the way to do is somewhat of an understatement, check out [[Tardis:To Do List]] if you want to see the long list of things that need doing, then of course there's the [[Special:WantedPages|Wantedpages]].
+:The book plots are something I've considered, but not sure if they're needed. The Publisher's Summary (aka Blurb) does a relatively good job of summarising the story.
+:It's just considering that we're currently lacking plots for several TV stories (that is unique plots separate from Wikipedia), and there are a rather large amounts of novels ([[NA]], [[MA]], [[BNA]], [[EDA]], [[PDA]], [[TN]], [[VD]], [[ST]], [[NSA]], [[BFBS]] and [[TWN]]) they're all the main ranges of novels.
+:But many of the novel articles still need developing many are lacking detailed references and continuity sections. Many of the [[Short Trips (series)|Short Trips]], [[Virgin Decalogs]] and [[Big Finish Bernice Summerfield Series]] (short story anthologies) are lacking summaries of their short stories, the setting/year field in a lot of these short stories (within the infobox) is lacking any information.
+:Page counts (again within the infobox) is lacking on a lot of pages. (These are just the things I can think of off the top of my head though). --[[User:Tangerineduel|Tangerineduel]] 14:04, November 28, 2009 (UTC)