Trusted
49,383
edits
More actions
→Fan Gallery and their licensing
Tag: 2017 source edit |
Tag: 2017 source edit |
||
| Line 847: | Line 847: | ||
I think the comparison to charity anthology releases is a fair one. Some of those have multiple licensed characters / concepts but because the entire project as a whole isn’t licensed all of the stories are (rightfully) viewed the same. [[User:PoolsideJazz|PoolsideJazz]] [[User talk:PoolsideJazz|<span title="Talk to me">☎</span>]] 16:11, 24 November 2020 (UTC) | I think the comparison to charity anthology releases is a fair one. Some of those have multiple licensed characters / concepts but because the entire project as a whole isn’t licensed all of the stories are (rightfully) viewed the same. [[User:PoolsideJazz|PoolsideJazz]] [[User talk:PoolsideJazz|<span title="Talk to me">☎</span>]] 16:11, 24 November 2020 (UTC) | ||
::Right, sorry again, then. But please see my admin-hat-on clarification regarding charity anthologies. There ''is no such thing'' as a "licensed" charity story, because the very definition of a charity story (as we define the term when excluding them) is "a story that's not a commercial product and instead promotes charity". If that ''weren't'' the case we'd find ourselves failing to cover the likes of [[TV]]: ''[[Time Crash (TV story)|Time Crash]]''. This does not necessarily ''prevent'' us from not covering a ''Fan Gallery'' story even though it's fully-licensed; this is quite a novel situation. But the precedent of "fully-licensed charity stories we nevertheless exclude" isn't valid because there ain't no such thing. [[User:Scrooge MacDuck|Scrooge MacDuck]] [[User talk:Scrooge MacDuck|<span title="Talk to me">☎</span>]] 16:17, 24 November 2020 (UTC) | ::Right, sorry again, then. But please see my admin-hat-on clarification regarding charity anthologies. There ''is no such thing'' as a "licensed" charity story, because the very definition of a charity story (as we define the term when excluding them) is "a story that's not a commercial product and instead promotes charity". If that ''weren't'' the case we'd find ourselves failing to cover the likes of [[TV]]: ''[[Time Crash (TV story)|Time Crash]]''. This does not necessarily ''prevent'' us from not covering a ''Fan Gallery'' story even though it's fully-licensed; this is quite a novel situation. But the precedent of "fully-licensed charity stories we nevertheless exclude" isn't valid because there ain't no such thing. [[User:Scrooge MacDuck|Scrooge MacDuck]] [[User talk:Scrooge MacDuck|<span title="Talk to me">☎</span>]] 16:17, 24 November 2020 (UTC) | ||
:::And yet trailers are invalid because the Wiki deems them commercial. Big double standard here.<div style="background-color:#0E234E; border: solid 0.5px gold; display: inline; white-space: nowrap;">[[doctorwho:user:Epsilon the Eternal|<span style="background:#0E234E; color:white"><tt>'''Epsilon'''</tt></span>]]''' '''[[User talk:Epsilon the Eternal|📯]] [[doctorwho:special:Contributions/Epsilon the Eternal|📂]]</div> 16:21, 24 November 2020 (UTC) | |||