Trusted
8,469
edits
More actions
→Aren't these just Time Lords?
NateBumber (talk | contribs) (Created page with "== Aren't these just Time Lords? == By the principle set by the ''Faction Paradox'' threads, the wiki allows for a degree of transitive property. If # a licensed work (''U...") Tag: 2017 source edit |
Tag: 2017 source edit |
||
| Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
# there are other licensed works which say "Time Lords are commonly seen as or called gods" (cf, like, a billion ''Doctor Who'' stories) | # there are other licensed works which say "Time Lords are commonly seen as or called gods" (cf, like, a billion ''Doctor Who'' stories) | ||
... we're allowed to do the obvious thing. We're not an author wiki, we're a fan wiki; if 100% of fans read it and go "Yeah these are obviously Time Lords," that's what our coverage should say, too. This is the principle which lets us go, "Yeah, the [[Great Houses]] are the [[Time Lord]]s, and [[the Homeworld]] is [[Gallifrey]]." So in this scenario, can't we just come out and say that the Gods of the Minyans are Time Lords? – [[User:NateBumber|n8]] ([[User talk:NateBumber|☎]]) 02:06, 8 March 2021 (UTC) | ... we're allowed to do the obvious thing. We're not an author wiki, we're a fan wiki; if 100% of fans read it and go "Yeah these are obviously Time Lords," that's what our coverage should say, too. This is the principle which lets us go, "Yeah, the [[Great Houses]] are the [[Time Lord]]s, and [[the Homeworld]] is [[Gallifrey]]." So in this scenario, can't we just come out and say that the Gods of the Minyans are Time Lords? – [[User:NateBumber|n8]] ([[User talk:NateBumber|☎]]) 02:06, 8 March 2021 (UTC) | ||
:I think the Homeworld treatment requires that the ''term'' "gods" be used in the licensed story related to Time Lords. I did plan on making a discussion about this, but after the forum threads were back, since I wanted to have the original precedent to refer to. [[User:Najawin|Najawin]] [[User talk:Najawin|<span title="Talk to me">☎</span>]] 02:23, 8 March 2021 (UTC) | |||