Trusted
46,623
edits
→Vienna definitely IS DWU
NateBumber (talk | contribs) No edit summary Tag: 2017 source edit |
Tag: 2017 source edit |
||
| Line 31: | Line 31: | ||
:::See also the extras of ''[[Jago & Litefoot: Series Twelve]]'', where just like Richardson with ''[[Vienna (series)|Vienna]]'', the cast comments that they've built up a "separate universe" from ''Doctor Who''. Actors and authors use that phrase a lot in this context to describe the experience of using spinoffs to do stories that wouldn't be a good fit for ''Doctor Who'' proper. It's true: ''Jago & Litefoot'' is its own thing, and its writers don't care too much about continuity or child-friendliness or any of those things ''Doctor Who'' writers have to pay attention to. But that's not a reason to exclude ''Jago & Litefoot'' from our coverage, because we're more than a ''Doctor Who'' wiki! We're a ''Torchwood'' wiki; we're a ''Gallifrey'' wiki; we're an ''Iris Wildthyme'' wiki; and we should be a ''Vienna'' wiki, too. Ideally we'd wait for the forums, but given that their return is still indefinitely far away ... Well, for whatever it's worth, as an ordinarily user I'd be in favor of waiving protocol in this instance. – [[User:NateBumber|n8]] ([[User talk:NateBumber|☎]]) 20:15, 30 March 2021 (UTC) | :::See also the extras of ''[[Jago & Litefoot: Series Twelve]]'', where just like Richardson with ''[[Vienna (series)|Vienna]]'', the cast comments that they've built up a "separate universe" from ''Doctor Who''. Actors and authors use that phrase a lot in this context to describe the experience of using spinoffs to do stories that wouldn't be a good fit for ''Doctor Who'' proper. It's true: ''Jago & Litefoot'' is its own thing, and its writers don't care too much about continuity or child-friendliness or any of those things ''Doctor Who'' writers have to pay attention to. But that's not a reason to exclude ''Jago & Litefoot'' from our coverage, because we're more than a ''Doctor Who'' wiki! We're a ''Torchwood'' wiki; we're a ''Gallifrey'' wiki; we're an ''Iris Wildthyme'' wiki; and we should be a ''Vienna'' wiki, too. Ideally we'd wait for the forums, but given that their return is still indefinitely far away ... Well, for whatever it's worth, as an ordinarily user I'd be in favor of waiving protocol in this instance. – [[User:NateBumber|n8]] ([[User talk:NateBumber|☎]]) 20:15, 30 March 2021 (UTC) | ||
:::: I won't repeat what's already been said, but I agree that ''Vienna'' should be covered - it seems no different to me than, say, ''Graceless''. [[User:Jack "BtR" Saxon|Jack "BtR" Saxon]] [[User talk:Jack "BtR" Saxon|<span title="Talk to me">☎</span>]] 21:31, 30 March 2021 (UTC) | |||