Tech, emailconfirmed, Administrators
38,243
edits
→Black Dalek in Vengeance
No edit summary Tag: 2017 source edit |
Tag: 2017 source edit |
||
| Line 58: | Line 58: | ||
== Black Dalek in Vengeance == | == Black Dalek in Vengeance == | ||
I seem to recall dialogue referring to the Dalek in ''[[Vengeance (audio story)|Vengeance]]'' as "the", rather than "a", Black Dalek, which I assume was the root of my defaulting to the assumptiont hat they indeed meant [[the Black Dalek|''the'' Black Dalek]]. It wouldn't be the first time the Black Dalek ''appeared'' to be destroyed while actually surviving through means unknown. I will however confess that my memory of that element of ''Vengeance'' is already getting spotty. Am I misremembering? [[User:Scrooge MacDuck|Scrooge MacDuck]] [[User talk:Scrooge MacDuck|<span title="Talk to me">☎</span>]] 22:33, 25 June 2021 (UTC) | I seem to recall dialogue referring to the Dalek in ''[[Vengeance (audio story)|Vengeance]]'' as "the", rather than "a", Black Dalek, which I assume was the root of my defaulting to the assumptiont hat they indeed meant [[the Black Dalek|''the'' Black Dalek]]. It wouldn't be the first time the Black Dalek ''appeared'' to be destroyed while actually surviving through means unknown. I will however confess that my memory of that element of ''Vengeance'' is already getting spotty. Am I misremembering? [[User:Scrooge MacDuck|Scrooge MacDuck]] [[User talk:Scrooge MacDuck|<span title="Talk to me">☎</span>]] 22:33, 25 June 2021 (UTC) | ||
: I mean, if he's black with golden adornments, I think it ''is'' appropriate to call him a Black Dalek. Regardless: thank you for the in-depth answer! In hindsight I think the mentions of "the" (rather than "a") Dalek Supreme are what made me jump to the assumption that this was the BDL, ''combined'' with the mention of him as a Black Dalek. But you're probably right. [[User:Scrooge MacDuck|Scrooge MacDuck]] [[User talk:Scrooge MacDuck|<span title="Talk to me">☎</span>]] 12:44, 26 June 2021 (UTC) | |||