2,167
edits
no edit summary
No edit summary Tag: 2017 source edit |
No edit summary Tag: 2017 source edit |
||
| Line 18: | Line 18: | ||
:::: …No, that's not really the argument, actually. Unless the link was textually present ''upon release'', the Wibbsey=Frimbly equivalence doesn't provide a licensed link to the DWU for ''Baker's End'', any more than we would started covering all of ''Star Trek'', had ''[[Assimilation² (comic story)|Assimilation²]]'' revealed the ''Enterprise'' to have been a disguised TARDIS this entire time. What the equivalences prove is that ''Baker's End'' passes [[Tardis:Valid sources|Rule ''4'']] — that it is intended to be continuous with ''Nest Cottage'', contra the conclusions of the original debate on ''Baker's End''. ''Baker's End'' otherwise contains its fair share of characters who debuted in the DWU, most notably [[Vince Cosmos]]. ''That'' is the (thus far, in the absence of a Forum, entirely theoretical) argument for reconsidering ''Baker's End'' coverage that would actually hold some water. <span style="color: #baa3d6;font-family:Comic Sans;">[[User:Scrooge MacDuck|'''Scrooge MacDuck''']]</span> <span style="color: #baa3d6;">[[User_talk:Scrooge MacDuck|⊕]]</span> 23:17, 27 January 2022 (UTC) | :::: …No, that's not really the argument, actually. Unless the link was textually present ''upon release'', the Wibbsey=Frimbly equivalence doesn't provide a licensed link to the DWU for ''Baker's End'', any more than we would started covering all of ''Star Trek'', had ''[[Assimilation² (comic story)|Assimilation²]]'' revealed the ''Enterprise'' to have been a disguised TARDIS this entire time. What the equivalences prove is that ''Baker's End'' passes [[Tardis:Valid sources|Rule ''4'']] — that it is intended to be continuous with ''Nest Cottage'', contra the conclusions of the original debate on ''Baker's End''. ''Baker's End'' otherwise contains its fair share of characters who debuted in the DWU, most notably [[Vince Cosmos]]. ''That'' is the (thus far, in the absence of a Forum, entirely theoretical) argument for reconsidering ''Baker's End'' coverage that would actually hold some water. <span style="color: #baa3d6;font-family:Comic Sans;">[[User:Scrooge MacDuck|'''Scrooge MacDuck''']]</span> <span style="color: #baa3d6;">[[User_talk:Scrooge MacDuck|⊕]]</span> 23:17, 27 January 2022 (UTC) | ||
::::: While I admire your determination to correct me at every given opportunity, you are wrong here Scrooge. | |||
::::: The authorial intent for the character of Mrs Frimbly has always been extremely clear. She was always intended to be [[Fenella Wibbsey]], right from the very first installment. Just because the character is operating under another name does not mean that these were intended to be separate individuals as Paul Magrs does this a lot with characters he owns. Her involvement is far more meaningful an argument than [[Vince Cosmos]]'s appearance, although both arguments hold water. [[User:RadMatter|RadMatter]] [[User talk:RadMatter|<span title="Talk to me">☎</span>]] 23:31, 27 January 2022 (UTC) | |||