emailconfirmed, Administrators
129,644
edits
More actions
Talk:You are the Absurd Hero (short story) (edit)
Revision as of 22:58, 18 September 2022
, 18 September 2022no edit summary
Tag: 2017 source edit |
Shambala108 (talk | contribs) No edit summary Tag: 2017 source edit |
||
| Line 29: | Line 29: | ||
::::Since this has attracted some twitter attention, let me just note that I think our validity rules concerning nonlinear stories are stupid as hell. I would love for this story to be valid - I just don't think according to our rules it is. My proposal is to note that it's probably currently invalid and then, whenever the forums are back, try to change the rules to make it valid based on Flip Flop, this, the idea that there's no real clear demarcation, and the specific note I left at [[Talk:Warring States (novel)|Warring States]] in preparation for something like this. I think there's a good case to be made, especially if we also try to hitch together an argument that in-universe dictionaries and the like should be valid. But we can't do that just now. Which is a shame. [[User:Najawin|Najawin]] [[User talk:Najawin|<span title="Talk to me">☎</span>]] 21:24, 18 September 2022 (UTC) | ::::Since this has attracted some twitter attention, let me just note that I think our validity rules concerning nonlinear stories are stupid as hell. I would love for this story to be valid - I just don't think according to our rules it is. My proposal is to note that it's probably currently invalid and then, whenever the forums are back, try to change the rules to make it valid based on Flip Flop, this, the idea that there's no real clear demarcation, and the specific note I left at [[Talk:Warring States (novel)|Warring States]] in preparation for something like this. I think there's a good case to be made, especially if we also try to hitch together an argument that in-universe dictionaries and the like should be valid. But we can't do that just now. Which is a shame. [[User:Najawin|Najawin]] [[User talk:Najawin|<span title="Talk to me">☎</span>]] 21:24, 18 September 2022 (UTC) | ||
:::::Just to be clear, I don't care '''at all''' about whether this is valid or not. I just want to know why people keep citing Twitter in their complaints about our policies??? Who on Twitter is actually helping to edit this site that we should care about their opinions? It's been pretty well-established in other non-DWU situations that many Twitter users attack whatever they don't like and don't seem to have any brains or thought processes. So please please please please stop citing Twitter as a reason for doing or not doing '''''anything''''' on this wiki. [[User:Shambala108|Shambala108]] [[User talk:Shambala108|<span title="Talk to me">☎</span>]] 22:58, 18 September 2022 (UTC) | |||