Trusted
8,503
edits
→New main image
No edit summary Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit 2017 source edit |
Tag: 2017 source edit |
||
| Line 44: | Line 44: | ||
Very much in favor of #2 or #3. A push for an illustration as opposed to the actor for the purposes of trying to illustrate NPOV is inherently pushing a POV in my honest opinion. [[Special:Contributions/73.135.193.157|73.135.193.157]]<sup>[[User talk:73.135.193.157#top|talk to me]]</sup> 16:41, 22 December 2022 (UTC) | Very much in favor of #2 or #3. A push for an illustration as opposed to the actor for the purposes of trying to illustrate NPOV is inherently pushing a POV in my honest opinion. [[Special:Contributions/73.135.193.157|73.135.193.157]]<sup>[[User talk:73.135.193.157#top|talk to me]]</sup> 16:41, 22 December 2022 (UTC) | ||
:Well, yes, it's pushing a POV. Namely, the Neutral one. Regardless, I recall policy explicitly stating that if we have cover art vs diagetic picture, we must choose the latter, see [[T:IUI]]. (There was a talk page article where there was an exception made for a character whose only diagetic appearance was a particularly poor illustration, in comparison to some good cover art, but this isn't the case here, and I can't recall what it was.) [[User:Najawin|Najawin]] [[User talk:Najawin|<span title="Talk to me">☎</span>]] 19:33, 22 December 2022 (UTC) | |||