User talk:NateBumber: Difference between revisions

User talk:NateBumber (edit)

Revision as of 21:46, 2 February 2023

553 bytes added , 2 February 2023

→‎Benny NAs

Jack

Trusted

45,834

edits

@@ Line 378: / Line 378: @@
 == Benny NAs ==
-Personally, I don't agree. I don't see the value in dividing them and, given that ''Oh No It Isn't'' was considered the start of the "New New Adventures", we'd have to either count it as a BNA (despite it being before the rebrand) or call the first half the Doctor New Adventures or something.
+Personally, I don't agree. I don't see the value in dividing them and, given that ''Oh No It Isn't'' was considered the start of the "New New Adventures", we'd have to either count [''The Dying Days''] as a BNA (despite it being before the rebrand) or call the first half the Doctor New Adventures or something.
 There aren't any direct precedents that I can think of that apply to this situation. The closest I can think of is not making any distinction between season 4 with First and season 4 with Second, or with the whole Classic/New Who thing. If you're not convinced, perhaps it's something to bring up on the forums. [[User:Jack &#34;BtR&#34; Saxon|Jack &#34;BtR&#34; Saxon]] [[User talk:Jack &#34;BtR&#34; Saxon|<span title="Talk to me">☎</span>]] 20:41, 2 February 2023 (UTC)
+: So drafted and redrafted my message to try to get my point across and ended up missing out a key part! What I meant (and have now amended the above message) to say was "''Oh No It Isn't'' was considered the start of the "New New Adventures", we'd have to either count ''The Dying Days'' as a BNA (despite it being before the rebrand) or call the first half the Doctor New Adventures or something." [[User:Jack &#34;BtR&#34; Saxon|Jack &#34;BtR&#34; Saxon]] [[User talk:Jack &#34;BtR&#34; Saxon|<span title="Talk to me">☎</span>]]