8,058
edits
Stardizzy2 (talk | contribs) |
Stardizzy2 (talk | contribs) |
||
Line 10: | Line 10: | ||
It should, and the show simply names it the Ancient One. Also the character is portrayed by a male actor making it unlikely the character is male. I've edited most the article to be more canon, but I can't fix the title. Please people, stop referencing spin-off material willy-nilly. Most of the classic series spin-off material is NOT confirmed as canon, and some of it has been proven not to be (Human Nature for example, or the whole 'looms' bullshit for Time Lords). The canon is what's in the show, and that is what the main article consists of. If you want to mention spin-off material related to the subject, do so in a subsection. [[User:MegaNerd18|MegaNerd18]] 13:14, May 8, 2010 (UTC) | It should, and the show simply names it the Ancient One. Also the character is portrayed by a male actor making it unlikely the character is male. I've edited most the article to be more canon, but I can't fix the title. Please people, stop referencing spin-off material willy-nilly. Most of the classic series spin-off material is NOT confirmed as canon, and some of it has been proven not to be (Human Nature for example, or the whole 'looms' bullshit for Time Lords). The canon is what's in the show, and that is what the main article consists of. If you want to mention spin-off material related to the subject, do so in a subsection. [[User:MegaNerd18|MegaNerd18]] 13:14, May 8, 2010 (UTC) | ||
:official TARDIS Wiki policy (unless they've changed it since I last stopped by) makes | :official TARDIS Wiki policy (unless they've changed it since I last stopped by) makes non-tv material(or at least most of them), canon. I think that novelizations remain a gray area. however, we decided when the Wiki started to include Expanded Universe material as canon. | ||
dubiously canonical info (from novelizations, etc.) goes in the "Apocrypha" section, or it least it did.)--[[User:Stardizzy2|Stardizzy2]] 14:28, May 8, 2010 (UTC) |
edits