229,659
edits
(Bot: Automated import of articles) |
m (Bot: Automated text replacement (-'''User:(SOTO/Forum Archive)/(.*?)/\@comment-([\d\.]+)-(\d+)/\@comment-([\d\.]+)-(\d+)'''\n([\s\S]*)\[\[Category:SOTO archive posts\]\] +\7/-/-)) |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
I don't agree. Smith seems to be confusing ''are your stories parody?'' with ''are your stories canon?'' Hence her comment about Ellerby's strips. Canon and previous continuity (such as a talking Weeping Angel - incidentally, something we ''have'' seen with [[Angel Bob]]) are, of course, non-relevant to whether something is valid or not. | I don't agree. Smith seems to be confusing ''are your stories parody?'' with ''are your stories canon?'' Hence her comment about Ellerby's strips. Canon and previous continuity (such as a talking Weeping Angel - incidentally, something we ''have'' seen with [[Angel Bob]]) are, of course, non-relevant to whether something is valid or not. | ||
Furthermore, why should Smith's backups have any different licensing guidelines than Ellerby's or Bell's? If Smith was crossing the line with her stories, it stands to reason she and/or her editor, Andrew James, would have been forced to redo the strips since the warning against parody was in place since the beginning. | Furthermore, why should Smith's backups have any different licensing guidelines than Ellerby's or Bell's? If Smith was crossing the line with her stories, it stands to reason she and/or her editor, Andrew James, would have been forced to redo the strips since the warning against parody was in place since the beginning. | ||
<noinclude>[[Category:SOTO archive posts]]</noinclude> | <noinclude>[[Category:SOTO archive posts|Inclusion debates/20150725190725-5545417/20150818215024-1293767]]</noinclude> |